RE: Ron Paul: Internet Celeb?
...and John Edwards (Obama only recently took the lead by a hair).
Bwahahahahahah!
Good grief, the media (all of it) is so clueless. The only reason it survives is the (frightenly) large number of people who prefer to be told what to think.
There's something going on with this guy, he's touched a nerve out there. We ought to hear more about him.
Indeed, just as Ronald Reagan did in 1979 and 1980. On a side note, although I applaud Jeffrey in writing this article, I seriously doubt the folks at HuffPo are going to like Paul any better when they understand his whole position. He is strongly pro-life, strongly opposed to open borders, and vehemently dislikes the welfare state.
If the 2008 election came down to a race between Clinton and Paul, it would be one of the most stark dichotomies in American political history. It would be a referendum on the future direction of the country. People would be choosing between a business-as-usual, socialist politician, hungry for power, and a constitutionally founded libertarian.
Fortunately for Clinton, the GOP machine will do its level best to make sure that contest never happens.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home