RE: RE: 'Outsider' takes helm of the Southern Baptist Convention

(The SBC’s getting ‘liberal’) Compared to what?

To previous incarnations, maybe?

Once again, my inside SBC sources tell me this guy is very definitely a conservative Baptist (whatever that is).

Well, is he scripturally conservative? Socially conservative? Fiscally conservative? Genetically conservative? Naturally, if discussing a Baptist, calling him 'conservative' should probably refer to his views on scripture. But sometimes, in order for everyone to get along, it may not get that deep...

Don't look for them to start recognizing homosexual marriages or welcoming homosexual pastors. I don't see them turning into anti-war pacifists any time soon, either.

Oh yeah, I’m sure you’re right about that. But it sounds like this guy might not need a paper bag to get his six-pack from the cash register to the car. That could be considered ‘liberal’ for a typical Baptist. I’m joking, sort of. Anyway, even the most miniscule updates in leadership style couldn’t hurt the SBC. A ‘kinder, gentler’ SBC could definitely help in attracting new members, too. Maybe it's not 'getting liberal' — maybe it's simply progress.

One thing I've always wondered about the Baptists: they put a lot of emphasis on their churches being independent. They don't ordain their pastors, nor do they require baptism or a confession of faith.

Really? Are you sure about those last two?

Yet they have this convention and they elect a national leader and expect churches that call themselves Southern Baptist to toe the party line. How can a denomination be non-denominational?

Good question. Is it because the majority of Southern Baptists enjoy the benefits of being a strong voting bloc, but then, want to keep more of their funds to spend locally and the power to define the church’s service style and direction? I’m just guessing.