.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Bully Pulpit

The term "bully pulpit" stems from President Theodore Roosevelt's reference to the White House as a "bully pulpit," meaning a terrific platform from which to persuasively advocate an agenda. Roosevelt often used the word "bully" as an adjective meaning superb/wonderful. The Bully Pulpit features news, reasoned discourse, opinion and some humor.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Mark Levin's $100,000 Challenge to Chris Matthews

Mark Levin to MSNBC Hosts: ‘I’m Gonna Drag Your A** Into Court’

(By Jeffrey Lord, The American Spectator) -
Conservative radio talk show host Mark Levin has put out a stunning challenge to those left-wing media personalities accusing conservative talk radio stars and Sarah Palin of encouraging murder.




"Somebody has to draw the line, Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Joe Scarborough. Test me."

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

3 Responses to Mark Levin Issues $100,000 Challenge To Chris Matthews

1.
True Patriot
January 14, 2011 at 10:08 AM

And in doing that Briebart exposed the lying. No one got any money.

Good for Mark. :-)
Reply
2.
grace
January 15, 2011 at 3:31 AM

(As quoted)
…In the op-ed, Assange defends the publication of the secret documents. But he also writes, “Sarah Palin says I should be ‘hunted down like Osama bin Laden.”

…In a November 29 Facebook posting, Palin blasted the Obama administration’s handling of the matter. And she also wrote, “Assange is not a ‘journalist,’ any more than the ‘editor’ of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a ‘journalist.’ He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

To pursue Assange with the same urgency as we pursue Bin Laden/Taliban/al Qaeda would be to seek to assassinate him, since that is U.S. policy. Palin is promoting and inciting MURDER by definition.

I challenge Levin to make the same offer to me of $100,000 IN WRITING and I will take him up on it. I want a contract made up (but not the kind Palin likes to put out as head of the “Moosechili Mafia”). This is an open challenge and if he pretends to have the right-wing wacko fringey NUTS to throw down with me, I will redeem that right now.

I also challenge Levin to “reFUDIATE” and prove in a legitimate and credible forum that Palin has not, as I think I have evidenced herein, committed the crime of international terrorism, defamation, libel, reckless endangerment, malice, fraud, and slander in obscenely hypocritical attacks on Assange and/or others she has “targeted” akin to the “blood libel” accusation she offensively, misguidedly vomited from deep within her frozen Batcave lair.

Throw down, Levin, and let’s “duel” with our little plastic “surveyor” symbols like good “titles of nobility” esquired lawyers do. And bring on all the tapes of your show so we can apply the same standard of “evidence” to you as you hold Matthews to. That’s the deal.


Oh, and BTW, unlike Bats in the Beehive, I don’t have the arrogance to make baseless accusations like “pals around with terrorists” as if they are facts. I have at least the civility our rational president implored…to admit this is MY opinion and I have presented a basis for it and not implied anyone should be assassinated or that the Geneva Convention’s civilized mandates be violated because Levin and Palin don’t agree with me.

Saturday, January 15, 2011 4:20:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home